I:

FRESH Grievance lodged on line- on 30-11-2014:

YOUR GRIEVANCE IS REGISTERED SUCCESSFULLY!!  Your Registration Number is: DOPPW/E/2014/02906 dated 30-11-2014.

DEPARTMENT OF PENSION & PENSIONERS' WELFARE, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions

 Lodge Your Grievance Send Reminder/Clarification View Your Grievance Status Feedback Contact Us

Lodge Your Grievance/Send Reminder/Clarification/View Your Grievance Status/Feedback

YOUR GRIEVANCE IS REGISTERED SUCCESSFULLY!!

Your Registration Number is: DOPPW/E/2014/02906

Grievance Description:

DoPT Vide a specific Office Memorandum No.22011.4.98.Estt.D Dated 12.10.1998, given clear directions after consultation with the Ministry of Law, that in the event of failure to conduct the DPCs in time schedule, due to any administrative difficulties, on grounds of ‘reasons beyond control’, like Court cases, etc., the names of those retired employees, herein Ad Hoc ASCs.RPF retired in the intervening period, should find place in the DPC’s lists, if held in the later years, even by preparing extended Panels if necessary. Ministry of Railways, Railway Board, DG, RPF replied vide No. 2007.Sec.E.RTI.2, Dated 19-22 Sept-2008 that RETIRED AD HOC ASC NAMES.RETIRED EMPLOYEES have been dropped from the Panel lists as they were not in service, since RETIRED on the day-year when the DPCs were held, and quoted reference of DoPT- OM No. 22011.4.98-Estt. .D. Dated 12-10-1998. This is considered to be interpretation of their choice for applying only to suit to their convenience. KINDLY INTERVENE AND DO JUSTICE AND PROTECT FR 309 and OUR PENSION BENEFITS AT PAR WITH OUR JUNIORS by making out proper DPCs Panel lists by including my name above my junior to get pension benefit.( NOTE: Earlier Grievance lodged reference given is: PRSEC/E/2012/08795 dated 23-6-2012 – Reply received as CASE CLOSED: Date of Action        :                   16 Sep 2014)

FEW Details earlier sent:

1) Govt. of India, DoP&T Vide a specific Office Memorandum No.22011/4/98/Estt. (D) Dated 12-10-1998, given clear directions after consultation with the Ministry of Law, that in the event of failure to conduct the DPCs in time schedule, due to any administrative difficulties, on grounds of ‘reasons beyond control’, like Court cases, etc., the names of those retired employees, herein Ad Hoc ASCs/RPF retired in the intervening period, should find place in the DPC’s lists, if held in the later years, even by preparing extended Panels if necessary. But, Ministry of Railways, the Railway Board, DG, RPF replied vide No. 2007.Sec (E).RTI.2, Dated 19/22 Sept-2008 that RETIRED AD HOC ASC NAMES (RETIRED EMPLOYEES) have been dropped from the Panel lists as they were not in service, since RETIRED on the day/year when the DPCs were held, and quoted reference of this OM/duly citing DoP&T- OM No. 22011/4/98-Estt. (D) Dated 12-10-1998. This is considered to be interpretation of their choice or applying only to suit to their convenience. KINDLY INTERVENE AND DO JUSTICE AND PROTECT FR 309 and OUR PENSION BENEFITS AT PAR WITH OUR JUNIORS.

2) I am struggling to get the word ” AD HOC ” WIPED OUT from our RPF since 2006; (2) I have posted several hundreds of Representations by Post/ On Line/through E-mails and so on since then giving all details including to Honorable President of India, PM, DoP&PW, Railways, etc. I have received replies from the Railway Board for some of my Petitions, one or two I am reproducing herein for your information, if need be, and interested to get the matter settled , please go through and take action as deem fit and proper. (3) For favor of kind reference please: Honorable PMO’s Office, New Delhi –Letter No. Dy.No.2475/VIP/MOS (PP)/12 Dated 17-9-2012 addressed and sent to Ministry of Railways & others); No reply received for my Petition / Representation sent to Railways on 21-8-2014, and sending reminders thereafter, but so far no proper reply given for my query and about application of GOI/ Dept. of Personnel & Training issued clear directions issue Vide a specific Office Memorandum No.22011/4/98/Estt. (D) Dated 12-10-1998. This Order is still to be followed scrupulously as there are no changes/revision/amendments so far. “…This attitude showed clear violation and suppression of the just rights and privileges guaranteed under FR -309, and clearly indicated that they have not worked out the Panel lists as laid in this DoP&T Memorandum, and wantonly misinterpreted the directions to suit to their choice. My representations/Petitions are being closed for record sake by sending replies, like...”… Shri V.Seshadri , Retd RPF officer was considered for regular promotion to the rank of ASC in Group 'A' Jr. scale along with his juniors through UPSC on 12.05.2009. He was considered by UPSC for the year 2004 and 2005. Since he superannuation on 31.08.2006 his assessment is considered Not necessary in view of the DOPT OM No.35034/7/97 Estt D dated 08.02.2002. Due to different court cases the DPC was delayed and his promotion was not considered in due time. His juniors who were in service at the time of DPC got regular promotion. If he were in service at the time of DPC then his promotion might have been considered.

Honored Sir, the DoP&T OM No.35034/7/97 Estt D dated 08.02.2002, cited by the Railway Board has nothing to do with the GOI/ Dept. of Personnel & Training issued clear directions issue Vide a specific Office Memorandum No.22011/4/98/Estt. (D) Dated 12-10-1998, which they have to honor.