--TO : the HEH THE HONORABLE—SIR(s):

THE PRESIDENT OF INDIA; THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA; THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA; THE PRESIDENT, UPA & THE INC-SMT.SONIA GANDHI; THE VICE-PRESIDENT, THE INC; THE MINISTER OF RAILWAYS; THE MINISTER OF STATE (PERSONNEL & PENSIONS); THE CHAIRMAN, ,THE RAILWAY BOARD; THE DG, RPF, RAILWAY BOARD; THE DIRECTOR, CBI (FORMERLY THE DG,  RPF) ; THE CIC, RTI; THE DIRECTOR, DoP&PW, PGO, Do&PW; Advisor (Confdl.), Railway Board;EDRS (G); Director, (Estt),RPF; Member (Staff); ED(PG),Railway Board; Jt.Secy.(GaZ), Railway Board;…..

Most respectfully and humbly submitted for kind perusal, intervention with a prayer to render justice to the RPF ad hoc ASCs/ thrashed in the RPF:

ON Our Letters’ Petitions to the Railway Board, the DG,RPF no ACTION:

Representation/grievance pending – Sri.V.Seshadri, ASC/RPF/Retired from East Coast Railway- revision of the seniority list of the Inspectors, RPF, ad hoc ASCs regularization, and further proforma-promotion to the rank of DSCs at par with their juniors to have pensionary benefits-reg

In the words of the Lords of the Justice brought on record in the Judgment/Order:

“…:… ‘had I served my God as reverently as I did my King I would not have fallen on these days of penury’ is chanted in these group of petitions in the Shelian tune:’ I fall on the thorns of life I bleed.’ Old age, ebbing mental and physical prowess, atrophy of both muscle and brain powers permeating these petitions, the petitioners in the fall of life yearn for equality of treatment which is being meted out to those who are soon going to join and swell their own ranks…” [The Honorable Supreme Courts' Judgment on 17-12-1982 in Nakara Case in 1982 (W.P. 5939-5941/1980- D.S.Nakara and others Vs Union of India 1983-AIR130-SC].

Kindly go through the attached papers for details of my/RPF pensioners/Family pensioners – more than 200- ad hoc ASCs’ case fate-suffering/suffered since around 2000 and the Honorable HCs/SCs judgments/Orders not implemented for us; and that the DPCs held by all means are for some other’s profit and gain formulae, compressed and confined ad hoc ASCs as such till their retirement and even after retirement the RB, the DG,RPF with no consideration of sympathy, not followed by disowning and disallowed the DoP&T Orders/OMs as thrash to the RPF ad hoc ASCs at least to give pensionary benefits at par with their juniors by including the names in the extended panels as envisaged in the DOP&T Orders.

Wanton misinterpretation, misdirection and its application on the RPF retired ad ASCs i.e., DoP&PT OM No. No.22011/4/98-Estt.(D) dated 12-10-1998 as applied since 2000 by the DPCs in RPF, by dropping their names from the panel(s) lists by the DPCs and brining the juniors in their places, and the Railway Board/DG, RPF reply vide No. 2007/Sec(E)/RTI/2 , Dated 19/22 Sept/2008 showed the Railway Board, the DG,RPF suppression of the just rights and privileges’; all in addition to violation of the law, the rpf Act, the RPF Rules, the DoP&T Orders/OMS, the Hon’ble SCs Judgments/Orders.

Had the Railway Board, implemented the Judgment/Order dated 07-02-2006 of the Honorable High Court of Delhi in WP (C) 12612 to 12615 of 2004, in time, on or before 15-4-2006, my name would have been listed in the Panel List for the vacancy period of 2002-2006 by the DPC, and I too could have retired as DSC, like my juniors and got my legitimate Pensionary benefits in 2007 itself.

The Honorable Supreme Court of India expressed its displeasure and deplored the continuing attitude against the genuine cause of the public servants in 1991 itself in Yanamandra Guananada Sharma Vs. Union of India and others— 1991 (2) ATJ 123 (Calcutta)— 30-5-1991- ( “…We have noticed that, in spite of several judgments of the Tribunal and confirmation of the said decisions by the Supreme Court, the respondents, the Union of India are sticking to their own views & are not extending the benefits of decided cases to the persons similarly circumstanced until they are constrained to move the Tribunal. In short, the respondents are indirectly fomenting unnecessary litigations and wasting public money, making it prestige issue. This attitude of the respondents is deplorable and we express our deep displeasure over the same. The respondents as model employers are expected to take reasonable attitude and rational view of the whole thing and to act according to settled law of the land instead of bittering the relationship of the master and servant in this manner. We expect in future, respondents (Govt.) will behave rationally as a model employer instead of driving the desperate employee to take to legal recourse. All decisions of this type should be treated as judgments in rem and be applied to the persons similarly circumstanced…”).

FURTHER at least to know of the legitimacy OF THE case and how it was encumbranced by vested interests to hush up all the retired ad hoc ASCs since 2000 and bring forward the juniors in our places as DSCs kindly read with patience. Just to give YOU an example, the batch of direct ASCs of 2000,trained in 2002, are now Dys/DIGs and above and the departmental ASCs regularized in our places are working/retired as DSCs and above with all pensionary benefits, where as we the Inspectors of 1983/Grade –I- Inspector of 1991; ASC from 2002 retired as ASCs only.

It is sincerely opined that if the OM issued by the Department of Personnel &Training Office Memorandum.No.22011/4/98-ESTT. (D), Dated 12-10-1998 is followed scrupulously and implemented with authenticity in right spirit at least now, by preparing extended Panels as per the seniority list of the Inspectors from the year 1983—first Inspectors-Grade-I list and then followed by Inspectors-Grade-II list, which the Railway Board wants to combine and maintain a consolidated list of Inspectors from the year 1983 onwards, duly brining the names of the seniors, by proper interpolation of the names of the retired Inspectors/ad hoc ASCs also, and list their names, now retired, just above to their juniors names who are already enjoying the fruits of the seniors, the senior citizens of RPF Pensioners/Family Pensioners shall have the benefit of pension fixation at par with their juniors and also the problem of issue of First Class ‘A’ Pass to the ad hoc ASCs who have not completed three years of service but retired shall also be resolved amicably.

KINDLY READ THE Attachment