In W.P.No:15143/1990 of Honourable High Court of Andhra Pradesh ‘Judgment-Order’ dated 26-3-1998- in Jaigopal Singh/RPF Vs CSC/RPF and Others- Cause-On Admn. Delays-restoration  of seniority and retrospective promotion even after retirement from SI to ASC/RPF-Group ’A’ Cadre Post/ rank with all consequential benefits; The promotion from the rank of Sub-Inspector, RPF to the post of Inspector, RPF is by selection and though the selection from the rank of inspector-grade-ii to the rank of inspector-grade-i is non-selection post , in this case , the petitioner’s non-selection to higher Grade by the Respondents/ IG-cum-CSC, South Central Railway and by dropping his name from the select list by showing personal factors itself shows as to how the Respondents and /or the administration at the Railway Board, the DG,RPF can take advantage of their Power and Authority in suppressing the legitimate right and privileges of the Petitioners. The petitioner got not only the promotion but also all consequential and pensionary benefits but for the Honorourable High Court’s Judgment/Order.

12).

 In W.P.No:4722/1985 of Honourable High Court of Andhra Pradesh-‘Judgment-Order’- in Mir Moihiuddin/RPF Vs CSC/RPF and Others –Cause- On Administrative Delays-restoration of seniority and retrospective promotion from SI to ASC/RPF rank with all consequential benefits;

13).

 In W.P.No:6631/2002 and WPMP No.9156/2002-Judgement/Order-...contain”…it has been repeatedly held by the Supreme Court that the DPC should sit for every year regularly before the appointed date and that the case of eligible candidates within the one of consideration should be dealt with…”of Honourable High Court of Madras- and a score of other High Courts and of the Honourable Supreme Court– Judgments/Orders ‘causes- Rlys. delay/RPF timely to conduct regular DPCs to regularize the adhoc ASCs/RPF who are/were working as such for several years by which next promotion as DSC and other benefits lost/denied/deprived to ADHOC ASCs ,etc can be solved;

14).