To
Date: 12-3-2013
The Inspector General/ Admn,
Railway Protection Force,
And Appellate Authority-88,
Railway Board, RAIL BHAVAN,
NEW DELHI-110001.
Honored Sir,
Sub: Appeal against the information supplied under
RTI Act, 2005 vide your Office Letter No. 2012 /Sec (E) /RTI/260 dated
08-01-2013 & Ltr.No.2012/Sec (E)/RTI/ 243- ID 29371 dated
06-3-2013—regarding regularization of ad hoc ASCs, etc-reg.
Ref: 1.Your
Letter No.2012/Sec (E)/RTI-260/ ID No.29387 dated 05-3-2013;
2.
Your Letter No.2012/Sec (E)/RTI-243/ ID No.29371 dated 06-3-2013;
3.
IG-cum-Chief security commissioner/RPF, East Coast Railway, Bhubaneswar
Letter
No.RPF/ECoR/E/08-03/1219 dated 06-3-2013 addressed to the
Director,
RPF, Railway Board, New Delhi; GM, East Coast Railway, BBS, and
others;
4. Your Letter No.2007/Sec (E)/RTI/2 dated 19/22-9-2008 in ref. to
DoP&T OM No.22011/4/98-Estt (D) dated 12-10-1998; &
5. RTI
Reply No.41011/12/2012-Estt. (D) - Dated 07-12-2012 by DoP&T in ref.
to
DoP&T OM-No.22011/4/98-Estt (D) dated 12-10-1998
<><><><><>
In reference to the letter cited at (2) dated 06-3-2013 above, from your
letter it is understood that – ‘…number of representations have been received
from various authorities at yours/Railway Board-DG,RPF, and that the matter is
under consideration and suitable reply will be furnished ‘; and that vide
letter cited at (3) dated 06-3-2013, the Railway Board vide Order dated
05-3-2013 endorsed that ‘MORLY has gone through the reply of the Office of the
IG-cum-CSC,RPF, East Coast Railway, BBS, and stated on website that Railway
Board returned the case with comments that-“.Follow up action may be taken at
your/their end(IG-cum-CSC, RPF, ECoR, BBS) with RB to obtain conclusive reply
of the said grievance”, and the IG-cum-CSC, RPF, ECoRly, BBS in the above cited
letter have requested the Director, RPF, RB, New Delhi to take early action
from their end on my grievance ( copy enclosed for ready reference) and ATR be
intimated to them so that further correspondence can be made with me and
uploaded the same in site.
Since the matter pertains to the RPF department, it may not be out of
place to mention that vide ref.4&5 – cited above, the DoP&T under its
OM No. No.22011/4/98-Estt (D) dated 12-10-1998, which envisaged that the DPCs
while preparing the Panel List(s) the names of the retired officials are also
be included in the Panel(s)-if need be, prepare extended panels… and that “…
according to legal opinion also it would not be in order if eligible employees
who were within the zone of consideration for the relevant year(s) but are not
actually in service when the DPC is being held, are not considered while
preparing year-wise zone of consideration/panel and, consequently, their
juniors are considered(in their places) who would not have been in the zone of
consideration if the DPC(s) had been held in time…”.But, in contra, ironically,
the RPF Directorate/RTI Reply vide reference No.4 cited above have interpreted
otherwise and removed/dropped the names of the retired ASCs- ad hoc and in
their place(s) juniors were regularized and given higher promotion as DSCs –
more than 100- and deprived the legitimate right of the seniors. This matter is
found to be taken up now as stated in Para above, and a reply is awaited from
Railway Board, DG, RPF office. Copy of representations and other cited
documents enclosed for ready reference please.
In
the circumstances explained above, I humbly submit that immediately on receipt
of reply to me from the concerned on the matter, I shall visit your office and
inspect the documents for further necessary action please.
Most
respectfully submitted. Thanking you Sir,
Yours faithfully,
Encl: as above:
( ).
(V.SESHADRI)
ASC/RPF/Retired.
<><><><><><>
No comments:
Post a Comment